in the corner ?
Caution: I have only read the last link, and this might seem a balancing* of fallacies**.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean they have nothing to offer, and of course your perspective might influence both. Ths seems more a selection of unfinishted reads, although I did read Huntington, and gave a good shot at Sandel, and found Hasnas, and Fukuyama is a big bugaboo, as we come around to Nietzsche and Rand.
*read juggling ?
** all thinking must be taken in the context of their times as well as the method of the format.
example: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine***, Aquinas and the web they weave sometimes in character or others. Not to mention More's the Pity.
a. A Shot in the Arm?
(b.)^ The Bully...
c. GOP-GAP
^ new notation for (sc)
*** Punderous Ponderings
[Speaking of the corner, is it MAR (mutually assured rhetoric?) The corollary, just because some have something to offer, does not mean they got it.]
(pocket ?)
